"Aggressively self-promoting" does not describe me. I have made a few bold moves in my writing career (one of which paid off), but I have never been guilty of dogged legwork on my own behalf. My works therefore tend to age, unread.
I have recently retired from my day job. I am still young enough (and not in the self-delusional sense of 60-is-the-new-40) that I now have more than enough time to work a
lot harder at getting myself either noticed or traditionally published.
I thought of trying, yet again, to get
Noah, Penny published by someone other than myself. Then I reviewed the story in my mind. I realized that it is
dated. No cellphones; no texting; no TV on demand; no internet at all. Not one of the characters — all of them in the eighth grade — makes any reference to social media. And how could they? The book was written in the mid-'90s.
What's worse, the kids communicate via landlines and —
gasp! — notes dropped in lockers and at front doors. No texting through the noosphere. Then there's the discussion of a certain
VHS videotape — a thing modern children probably can't even identify.
Well. Okay. Does
Noah, Penny have a charm as, perhaps, a period piece? Hardly. In what possible way could the '90s charm anyone? The book is not even touched by any particular cultural markers, as if Kurt Cobain makes an appearance. Perversely, it was written to be
timeless and instead it just seems
off. "Oh, look, a story about two eighth-graders circa 1995. Um. Why should I care about 1995?"
I've flirted with the idea of upgrading the tech in the book. Hey, I'll just pretend it is set in 2015! But we all know how instant access to the noosphere invalidates a lot of dramatic turns. ("What do you mean you can't find Hansel and Gretel? They've got GPS on their cells, right?") The choices my characters make are not likely to survive the possibility of tweeting.
I'll keep thinking about my options; but
Noah, Penny may have missed its chance.